English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 1341/3793 (35%)
Visitors : 2275740      Online Users : 27
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.taitheo.org.tw:8080/ir/handle/987654321/6816

    Title: 1750年愛德華茲「解聘事件」之研究-一個多視角歷史詮釋的嚐試
    An Attempt at Multi-Perspective Historical Interpretation on Jonathan Edwards’s Dismissal from Northampton, New England, 1750.
    Authors: 陳寬義
    Chen, Kuan-I
    Contributors: 台灣神學院
    Keywords: 愛德華茲
    Jonathan Edwards
    Edwards’s dismissal/eviction
    Church conflicts/ecclesiastical disputes
    The Half-Way Covenant
    The History of Redemption
    The Great Awakening
    Scottish Enlightenment
    New Divinity men
    New Divinity Movement
    Practical realism
    Christian realism
    Conflict theories
    Date: 2017-11-30
    Issue Date: 2018-04-19T06:06:23Z (UTC)
    Abstract: 十九世紀以來,傳統上對信仰團體間衝突事件的觀察,常將焦點置於幾項文化或社會因素上,對有關信仰團體本身對教義的認信與詮釋的影響,則常有意無意的忽略或避而不答。這種在啟蒙運動之後,刻意排除信仰元素的觀察進路,常因無法整全說明教會衝突發生的真正原因,使得教會歷史研究者無法從歷史文獻探索中,達成「重建過去,對話現在,指示未來」的歷史閱讀任務。
    Since the 19th century, the traditional way of observing conflicts of the faith community focuses on several cultural and social factors, while the methodology has consciously or unconsciously to overlook or ignore from the influence of the confession and interpretation of the doctrine of the faith community itself. The approach of observation that studiously excluded elements of faith has often failed to explain completely and integrally the real causes of church conflicts, however, and it becomes the mainstream since the Enlightenment. As a result, historians will find themselves failed to find an appropriate way to reach the task and mission of historical reading - "to rebuild the past, to dialogue with Contemporary, and to lead the way for the future".
    Based on practical realism thesis, this article tries to develop a multi-perspective, dialogic historical observation method. On one hand, the goal is to re-evaluate Jonathan Edwards' dismissal ("the dismissal") in 1750 during the dialogue and try to give an interpretation more integrally; on the other hand, the methodology is not merely trying to build some theoretical foundation for the church conflict study but also an appropriate approach to cut in.
    To meet the goal mentioned above, the article re-builds a historical scene by reanalyzing and interpreting the related documents of "the dismissal", bringing 1) both parties in church conflict, 2) the observation results of different methodologies, and 3) the author to reconstruct the scene and cross-dialogue with each other.
    The study criticizes and reinterprets "the dismissal" during the dialogue, while it also applies the theory of conflict as a basis to develop a complete method of observing on church conflicts' nature and form. Meanwhile, the study targets to deliver some suggestions and contribution for pastors and churches about how to deal with church conflicts.
    Appears in Collections:[台灣神學院] 研究部-神學博士班(Ph.D.)
    [13.研究部-神學博士(Ph.D.)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    7_???????201712pdf.pdf3042KbAdobe PDF821View/Open

    All items in TAITHEO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback